🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume atomic negotiations with the United States as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy was effective, and revealed fresh requests had originated from go-betweens to reopen talks with the Trump administration. He said Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is walking a complex path since Iran does not want be seen to be proceeding from a position of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader declaring the locations had been eliminated. Following this, Western states exercised their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative the American negotiator only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Iranian officials declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in some form if negotiations restart.

Trump in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of international law, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement showed the clash could not be resolved by military means. He said the strikes started with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith difficult to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Resolution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had consistently tried to enforce their will during the talks. Negotiations can still be viable and continues the final resolution to settle disputes, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they address to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the identical language."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have identified our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The Iranian people have grown more resilient, more united, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the aftermath of this attack."